Correlation Between Columbia Global and Mfs Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Global and Mfs Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Global and Mfs Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Growth Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Global and Mfs Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Global with a short position of Mfs Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Global and Mfs Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Global and Mfs Growth

0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Mfs is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Growth Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Growth Allocation and Columbia Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Global Technology are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Growth Allocation has no effect on the direction of Columbia Global i.e., Columbia Global and Mfs Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Global and Mfs Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Global Technology is expected to generate 2.17 times more return on investment than Mfs Growth. However, Columbia Global is 2.17 times more volatile than Mfs Growth Allocation. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Growth Allocation is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,570  in Columbia Global Technology on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,904  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 107.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Global Technology  vs.  Mfs Growth Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Global Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Global may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Mfs Growth Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Global and Mfs Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Global and Mfs Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Global and Mfs Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Global position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Growth's long position.
The idea behind Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Growth Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges