Correlation Between China Communications and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Communications and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Communications and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Communications Services and Verizon Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Communications and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Communications with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Communications and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for China Communications and Bank of America

0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Bank is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Communications Services and Verizon Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Verizon Communications and China Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Communications Services are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Verizon Communications has no effect on the direction of China Communications i.e., China Communications and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Communications and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days horizon China Communications is expected to generate 38.77 times less return on investment than Bank of America. In addition to that, China Communications is 1.25 times more volatile than Verizon Communications. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Verizon Communications is currently generating about 0.33 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,858  in Verizon Communications on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  342.00  from holding Verizon Communications or generate 8.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

China Communications Services  vs.  Verizon Communications

 Performance 
       Timeline  
China Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Communications Services are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, China Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Verizon Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Bank of America may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

China Communications and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with China Communications and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Communications and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Communications position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind China Communications Services and Verizon Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges