Correlation Between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commonwealth Global with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs.
Diversification Opportunities for Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs
0.1 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Commonwealth and Goldman is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Intern and Commonwealth Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commonwealth Global Fund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Intern has no effect on the direction of Commonwealth Global i.e., Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs
Assuming the 90 days horizon Commonwealth Global Fund is expected to generate 0.85 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Commonwealth Global Fund is 1.17 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs International is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,930 in Commonwealth Global Fund on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 253.00 from holding Commonwealth Global Fund or generate 13.11% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Commonwealth Global Fund vs. Goldman Sachs International
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Commonwealth Global |
| Goldman Sachs Intern |
Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs
The main advantage of trading using opposite Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commonwealth Global position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.The idea behind Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Goldman Sachs vs. Transamerica Cleartrack Retirement | Goldman Sachs vs. Putnman Retirement Ready | Goldman Sachs vs. Fidelity Managed Retirement | Goldman Sachs vs. Calvert Moderate Allocation |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.
Other Complementary Tools
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |