Correlation Between Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Gqg, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Redwood Real with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

-0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Redwood and Goldman is -0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Gqg in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Gqg and Redwood Real is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Redwood Real Estate are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Gqg has no effect on the direction of Redwood Real i.e., Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Redwood Real is expected to generate 2.11 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Redwood Real Estate is 18.11 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.58 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Gqg is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,805  in Goldman Sachs Gqg on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  362.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Gqg or generate 20.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Redwood Real Estate  vs.  Goldman Sachs Gqg

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Redwood Real Estate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Redwood Real Estate are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Redwood Real is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Gqg 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Gqg has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Redwood Real and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Redwood Real position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Redwood Real Estate and Goldman Sachs Gqg pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance