Correlation Between Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Crowdstrike Holdings with a short position of Berkshire Hathaway. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway.

Diversification Opportunities for Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Crowdstrike and Berkshire is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Berkshire Hathaway and Crowdstrike Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Crowdstrike Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Berkshire Hathaway. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Berkshire Hathaway has no effect on the direction of Crowdstrike Holdings i.e., Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Crowdstrike Holdings is expected to generate 1.69 times more return on investment than Berkshire Hathaway. However, Crowdstrike Holdings is 1.69 times more volatile than Berkshire Hathaway. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Berkshire Hathaway is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  29,687  in Crowdstrike Holdings on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,910  from holding Crowdstrike Holdings or generate 16.54% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Crowdstrike Holdings  vs.  Berkshire Hathaway

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Crowdstrike Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Crowdstrike Holdings are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather conflicting basic indicators, Crowdstrike Holdings exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Berkshire Hathaway 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hathaway are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

The main advantage of trading using opposite Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Crowdstrike Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Berkshire Hathaway can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Berkshire Hathaway will offset losses from the drop in Berkshire Hathaway's long position.
The idea behind Crowdstrike Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences