Correlation Between Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cisco Systems with a short position of Tupperware Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cisco and Tupperware is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Tupperware Brands and Cisco Systems is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cisco Systems are associated (or correlated) with Tupperware Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Tupperware Brands has no effect on the direction of Cisco Systems i.e., Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cisco Systems is expected to generate 0.11 times more return on investment than Tupperware Brands. However, Cisco Systems is 8.87 times less risky than Tupperware Brands. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Tupperware Brands is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,633  in Cisco Systems on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,288  from holding Cisco Systems or generate 27.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy89.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cisco Systems  vs.  Tupperware Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cisco Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cisco Systems are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak fundamental indicators, Cisco Systems displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Tupperware Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Tupperware Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cisco Systems position performs unexpectedly, Tupperware Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Tupperware Brands will offset losses from the drop in Tupperware Brands' long position.
The idea behind Cisco Systems and Tupperware Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated