Correlation Between Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cymbria with a short position of Brookfield Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure.

Diversification Opportunities for Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cymbria and Brookfield is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure Part in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Brookfield Infrastructure and Cymbria is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cymbria are associated (or correlated) with Brookfield Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Brookfield Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of Cymbria i.e., Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cymbria is expected to generate 9.66 times less return on investment than Brookfield Infrastructure. In addition to that, Cymbria is 1.85 times more volatile than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is currently generating about 0.25 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,426  in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  74.00  from holding Brookfield Infrastructure Partners or generate 3.05% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cymbria  vs.  Brookfield Infrastructure Part

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cymbria 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cymbria are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental drivers, Cymbria is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Brookfield Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Brookfield Infrastructure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cymbria position performs unexpectedly, Brookfield Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brookfield Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in Brookfield Infrastructure's long position.
The idea behind Cymbria and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals