Correlation Between IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between iPath Bloomberg Commodity and Invesco Optimum Yield, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in IPath Bloomberg with a short position of Invesco Optimum. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum.

Diversification Opportunities for IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between IPath and Invesco is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding iPath Bloomberg Commodity and Invesco Optimum Yield in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Invesco Optimum Yield and IPath Bloomberg is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on iPath Bloomberg Commodity are associated (or correlated) with Invesco Optimum. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Invesco Optimum Yield has no effect on the direction of IPath Bloomberg i.e., IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum

Considering the 90-day investment horizon iPath Bloomberg Commodity is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than Invesco Optimum. However, IPath Bloomberg is 1.02 times more volatile than Invesco Optimum Yield. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Invesco Optimum Yield is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,188  in iPath Bloomberg Commodity on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (32.00) from holding iPath Bloomberg Commodity or give up 1.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

iPath Bloomberg Commodity  vs.  Invesco Optimum Yield

 Performance 
       Timeline  
iPath Bloomberg Commodity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iPath Bloomberg Commodity are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable forward-looking indicators, IPath Bloomberg is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Invesco Optimum Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Invesco Optimum Yield are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental drivers, Invesco Optimum is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum

The main advantage of trading using opposite IPath Bloomberg and Invesco Optimum positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if IPath Bloomberg position performs unexpectedly, Invesco Optimum can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Invesco Optimum will offset losses from the drop in Invesco Optimum's long position.
The idea behind iPath Bloomberg Commodity and Invesco Optimum Yield pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance