Correlation Between Eastman Chemical and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Eastman Chemical and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Eastman Chemical and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Eastman Chemical and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Eastman Chemical and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Eastman Chemical with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Eastman Chemical and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for Eastman Chemical and China Communications
0.52 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Eastman and China is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Eastman Chemical and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and Eastman Chemical is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Eastman Chemical are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of Eastman Chemical i.e., Eastman Chemical and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Eastman Chemical and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days horizon Eastman Chemical is expected to generate 19.56 times less return on investment than China Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Eastman Chemical is 5.77 times less risky than China Communications. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 25.00 in China Communications Services on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 26.00 from holding China Communications Services or generate 104.0% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Eastman Chemical vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Eastman Chemical |
| China Communications |
Eastman Chemical and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Eastman Chemical and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite Eastman Chemical and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Eastman Chemical position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.| Eastman Chemical vs. SMA Solar Technology | Eastman Chemical vs. AECOM TECHNOLOGY | Eastman Chemical vs. Cogent Communications Holdings | Eastman Chemical vs. Ribbon Communications |
| China Communications vs. Superior Plus Corp | China Communications vs. SIVERS SEMICONDUCTORS AB | China Communications vs. Norsk Hydro ASA | China Communications vs. Reliance Steel Aluminum |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |