Correlation Between Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Eat Beyond Global and CITIGROUP INC 33, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Eat Beyond with a short position of CITIGROUP. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP.
Diversification Opportunities for Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP
-0.21 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Eat and CITIGROUP is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Eat Beyond Global and CITIGROUP INC 33 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CITIGROUP INC 33 and Eat Beyond is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Eat Beyond Global are associated (or correlated) with CITIGROUP. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CITIGROUP INC 33 has no effect on the direction of Eat Beyond i.e., Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP
Assuming the 90 days horizon Eat Beyond Global is expected to generate 75.2 times more return on investment than CITIGROUP. However, Eat Beyond is 75.2 times more volatile than CITIGROUP INC 33. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CITIGROUP INC 33 is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4.10 in Eat Beyond Global on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.30) from holding Eat Beyond Global or give up 7.32% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 95.65% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Eat Beyond Global vs. CITIGROUP INC 33
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Eat Beyond Global |
| CITIGROUP INC 33 |
Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP
The main advantage of trading using opposite Eat Beyond and CITIGROUP positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Eat Beyond position performs unexpectedly, CITIGROUP can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CITIGROUP will offset losses from the drop in CITIGROUP's long position.| Eat Beyond vs. Elysee Development Corp | Eat Beyond vs. Azimut Holding SpA | Eat Beyond vs. Ameritrans Capital Corp | Eat Beyond vs. Aimia Inc |
| CITIGROUP vs. AEP TEX INC | CITIGROUP vs. US BANK NATIONAL | CITIGROUP vs. Eat Beyond Global | CITIGROUP vs. Charles Schwab Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
| Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. |