Correlation Between Everest and Mars Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Everest and Mars Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Everest and Mars Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Everest Group and Mars Acquisition Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Everest and Mars Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Everest with a short position of Mars Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Everest and Mars Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Everest and Mars Acquisition

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Everest and Mars is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Everest Group and Mars Acquisition Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mars Acquisition Corp and Everest is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Everest Group are associated (or correlated) with Mars Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mars Acquisition Corp has no effect on the direction of Everest i.e., Everest and Mars Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Everest and Mars Acquisition

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Everest Group is expected to generate 4.64 times more return on investment than Mars Acquisition. However, Everest is 4.64 times more volatile than Mars Acquisition Corp. It trades about 0.39 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mars Acquisition Corp is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  35,097  in Everest Group on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,659  from holding Everest Group or generate 10.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Everest Group  vs.  Mars Acquisition Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Everest Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Everest Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Everest is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Mars Acquisition Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mars Acquisition Corp are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mars Acquisition is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Everest and Mars Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Everest and Mars Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Everest and Mars Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Everest position performs unexpectedly, Mars Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mars Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Mars Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Everest Group and Mars Acquisition Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments