Correlation Between Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Entravision Communications with a short position of Lloyds Banking. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking.

Diversification Opportunities for Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Entravision and Lloyds is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lloyds Banking Group and Entravision Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Entravision Communications are associated (or correlated) with Lloyds Banking. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lloyds Banking Group has no effect on the direction of Entravision Communications i.e., Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking

Assuming the 90 days horizon Entravision Communications is expected to under-perform the Lloyds Banking. In addition to that, Entravision Communications is 1.74 times more volatile than Lloyds Banking Group. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Lloyds Banking Group is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  248.00  in Lloyds Banking Group on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4.00) from holding Lloyds Banking Group or give up 1.61% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Entravision Communications  vs.  Lloyds Banking Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Entravision Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Entravision Communications are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Entravision Communications reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Lloyds Banking Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Lloyds Banking Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, Lloyds Banking is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking

The main advantage of trading using opposite Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Entravision Communications position performs unexpectedly, Lloyds Banking can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lloyds Banking will offset losses from the drop in Lloyds Banking's long position.
The idea behind Entravision Communications and Lloyds Banking Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges