Correlation Between Ford and UBS
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and UBS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and UBS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and UBS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and UBS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of UBS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and UBS.
Diversification Opportunities for Ford and UBS
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Ford and UBS is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and UBS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on UBS and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with UBS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of UBS has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and UBS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ford and UBS
If you would invest 1,015 in Ford Motor on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 98.00 from holding Ford Motor or generate 9.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 0.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Ford Motor vs. UBS
Performance |
Timeline |
Ford Motor |
UBS |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Ford and UBS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Ford and UBS
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and UBS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, UBS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in UBS will offset losses from the drop in UBS's long position.The idea behind Ford Motor and UBS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |