Correlation Between Fat Projects and Financial Strategies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fat Projects and Financial Strategies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fat Projects and Financial Strategies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fat Projects Acquisition and Financial Strategies Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fat Projects and Financial Strategies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fat Projects with a short position of Financial Strategies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fat Projects and Financial Strategies.
Diversification Opportunities for Fat Projects and Financial Strategies
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Fat and Financial is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fat Projects Acquisition and Financial Strategies Acquisiti in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Financial Strategies and Fat Projects is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fat Projects Acquisition are associated (or correlated) with Financial Strategies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Financial Strategies has no effect on the direction of Fat Projects i.e., Fat Projects and Financial Strategies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Fat Projects and Financial Strategies
Assuming the 90 days horizon Fat Projects is expected to generate 224.93 times less return on investment than Financial Strategies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Fat Projects Acquisition is 3.37 times less risky than Financial Strategies. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Financial Strategies Acquisition is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 10.00 in Financial Strategies Acquisition on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 6.00 from holding Financial Strategies Acquisition or generate 60.0% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Flat |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 81.82% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Fat Projects Acquisition vs. Financial Strategies Acquisiti
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Fat Projects Acquisition |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
| Financial Strategies |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Fat Projects and Financial Strategies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Fat Projects and Financial Strategies
The main advantage of trading using opposite Fat Projects and Financial Strategies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fat Projects position performs unexpectedly, Financial Strategies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial Strategies will offset losses from the drop in Financial Strategies' long position.The idea behind Fat Projects Acquisition and Financial Strategies Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Financial Strategies vs. NorthView Acquisition | Financial Strategies vs. Kairous Acquisition Corp | Financial Strategies vs. Globalink Investment Rights |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Other Complementary Tools
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account |