Correlation Between Federated High and California High-yield

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federated High and California High-yield at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federated High and California High-yield into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Federated High Yield and California High Yield Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federated High and California High-yield and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federated High with a short position of California High-yield. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federated High and California High-yield.

Diversification Opportunities for Federated High and California High-yield

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Federated and California is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Federated High Yield and California High Yield Municipa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on California High Yield and Federated High is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Federated High Yield are associated (or correlated) with California High-yield. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of California High Yield has no effect on the direction of Federated High i.e., Federated High and California High-yield go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Federated High and California High-yield

Assuming the 90 days horizon Federated High is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than California High-yield. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Federated High Yield is 1.88 times less risky than California High-yield. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. California High Yield Municipal is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  975.00  in California High Yield Municipal on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11.00  from holding California High Yield Municipal or generate 1.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Federated High Yield  vs.  California High Yield Municipa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Federated High Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Federated High Yield are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Federated High is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
California High Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in California High Yield Municipal are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, California High-yield is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Federated High and California High-yield Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Federated High and California High-yield

The main advantage of trading using opposite Federated High and California High-yield positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federated High position performs unexpectedly, California High-yield can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in California High-yield will offset losses from the drop in California High-yield's long position.
The idea behind Federated High Yield and California High Yield Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments