Correlation Between Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity International Real and Commodities Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity International with a short position of Commodities Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy.
Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy
0.06 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Commodities is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity International Real and Commodities Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Commodities Strategy and Fidelity International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity International Real are associated (or correlated) with Commodities Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Commodities Strategy has no effect on the direction of Fidelity International i.e., Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy
Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity International Real is expected to under-perform the Commodities Strategy. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Fidelity International Real is 1.4 times less risky than Commodities Strategy. The mutual fund trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Commodities Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,880 in Commodities Strategy Fund on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 101.00 from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or generate 3.51% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Fidelity International Real vs. Commodities Strategy Fund
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Fidelity International |
| Commodities Strategy |
Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity International and Commodities Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity International position performs unexpectedly, Commodities Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Commodities Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Commodities Strategy's long position.The idea behind Fidelity International Real and Commodities Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Commodities Strategy vs. Basic Materials Fund | Commodities Strategy vs. Energy Services Fund | Commodities Strategy vs. Real Estate Fund | Commodities Strategy vs. Precious Metals Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Other Complementary Tools
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |