Correlation Between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Growth with a short position of Fidelity Advisor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Fidelity is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Advisor Growth and Aggressive Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Growth Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Advisor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Advisor Growth has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Growth i.e., Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Growth is expected to generate 1.61 times less return on investment than Fidelity Advisor. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Aggressive Growth Allocation is 1.28 times less risky than Fidelity Advisor. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Advisor Growth is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,269  in Fidelity Advisor Growth on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  240.00  from holding Fidelity Advisor Growth or generate 5.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aggressive Growth Allocation  vs.  Fidelity Advisor Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aggressive Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Aggressive Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Advisor Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Growth are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Fidelity Advisor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Advisor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Growth position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Advisor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Advisor will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Advisor's long position.
The idea behind Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Advisor Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk