Correlation Between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Infrastructure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Growth with a short position of Fidelity Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Fidelity is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Infrastructure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Infrastructure and Aggressive Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Growth Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Growth i.e., Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Growth Allocation is expected to generate 0.87 times more return on investment than Fidelity Infrastructure. However, Aggressive Growth Allocation is 1.15 times less risky than Fidelity Infrastructure. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Infrastructure is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  909.00  in Aggressive Growth Allocation on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  264.00  from holding Aggressive Growth Allocation or generate 29.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aggressive Growth Allocation  vs.  Fidelity Infrastructure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aggressive Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Aggressive Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Infrastructure are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Fidelity Infrastructure may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Growth position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Infrastructure's long position.
The idea behind Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Infrastructure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios