Correlation Between Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Franklin Vertible Securities and Miller Vertible Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Franklin Vertible with a short position of Miller Convertible. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible.

Diversification Opportunities for Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Franklin and Miller is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Franklin Vertible Securities and Miller Vertible Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Miller Vertible Bond and Franklin Vertible is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Franklin Vertible Securities are associated (or correlated) with Miller Convertible. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Miller Vertible Bond has no effect on the direction of Franklin Vertible i.e., Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible

Assuming the 90 days horizon Franklin Vertible Securities is expected to generate 1.69 times more return on investment than Miller Convertible. However, Franklin Vertible is 1.69 times more volatile than Miller Vertible Bond. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Miller Vertible Bond is currently generating about 0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,259  in Franklin Vertible Securities on November 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  44.00  from holding Franklin Vertible Securities or generate 1.95% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Franklin Vertible Securities  vs.  Miller Vertible Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Franklin Vertible 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Vertible Securities are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Franklin Vertible is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Miller Vertible Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Miller Vertible Bond are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Miller Convertible is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible

The main advantage of trading using opposite Franklin Vertible and Miller Convertible positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Franklin Vertible position performs unexpectedly, Miller Convertible can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Miller Convertible will offset losses from the drop in Miller Convertible's long position.
The idea behind Franklin Vertible Securities and Miller Vertible Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm