Correlation Between Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Federated Short Intermediate Duration and Steward Ered Call, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federated Short-intermedia with a short position of Steward Covered. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered.
Diversification Opportunities for Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered
-0.05 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Federated and Steward is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Federated Short Intermediate D and Steward Ered Call in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Steward Ered Call and Federated Short-intermedia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Federated Short Intermediate Duration are associated (or correlated) with Steward Covered. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Steward Ered Call has no effect on the direction of Federated Short-intermedia i.e., Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered
Assuming the 90 days horizon Federated Short-intermedia is expected to generate 6.05 times less return on investment than Steward Covered. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Federated Short Intermediate Duration is 3.32 times less risky than Steward Covered. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Steward Ered Call is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 819.00 in Steward Ered Call on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 25.00 from holding Steward Ered Call or generate 3.05% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Federated Short Intermediate D vs. Steward Ered Call
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Federated Short-intermedia |
| Steward Ered Call |
Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered
The main advantage of trading using opposite Federated Short-intermedia and Steward Covered positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federated Short-intermedia position performs unexpectedly, Steward Covered can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Steward Covered will offset losses from the drop in Steward Covered's long position.The idea behind Federated Short Intermediate Duration and Steward Ered Call pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Steward Covered vs. Oklahoma Municipal Fund | Steward Covered vs. Ab Impact Municipal | Steward Covered vs. Federated Ohio Municipal | Steward Covered vs. Alliancebernstein National Municipal |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .
Other Complementary Tools
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world |