Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Niagara Mohawk Power, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Niagara Mohawk. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk

-0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Niagara is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Niagara Mohawk Power in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Niagara Mohawk Power and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Niagara Mohawk. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Niagara Mohawk Power has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 2.3 times more return on investment than Niagara Mohawk. However, FitLife Brands, is 2.3 times more volatile than Niagara Mohawk Power. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Niagara Mohawk Power is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,227  in FitLife Brands, Common on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,146  from holding FitLife Brands, Common or generate 51.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Niagara Mohawk Power

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FitLife Brands, Common are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Niagara Mohawk Power 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Niagara Mohawk Power are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively weak fundamental drivers, Niagara Mohawk may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Niagara Mohawk positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Niagara Mohawk can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Niagara Mohawk will offset losses from the drop in Niagara Mohawk's long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Niagara Mohawk Power pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories