Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Mid and Balanced Fund Retail, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Balanced Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Balanced is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Mid and Balanced Fund Retail in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Balanced Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Mid are associated (or correlated) with Balanced Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Balanced Fund Retail has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Mid is expected to generate 1.55 times more return on investment than Balanced Fund. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.55 times more volatile than Balanced Fund Retail. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Balanced Fund Retail is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,707  in Goldman Sachs Mid on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  210.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Mid or generate 5.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Mid  vs.  Balanced Fund Retail

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Mid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Mid are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Balanced Fund Retail 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Fund Retail are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Balanced Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Balanced Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Balanced Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Balanced Fund will offset losses from the drop in Balanced Fund's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Mid and Balanced Fund Retail pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges