Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Short and Columbia Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Columbia Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Columbia is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Short and Columbia Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Floating Rate and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Short are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 2.04 times less return on investment than Columbia Floating. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Short is 1.12 times less risky than Columbia Floating. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Floating Rate is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,780  in Columbia Floating Rate on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  581.00  from holding Columbia Floating Rate or generate 20.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.18%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Short  vs.  Columbia Floating Rate

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Short are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Floating Rate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Over the last 90 days Columbia Floating Rate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Columbia Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Floating will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Floating's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Short and Columbia Floating Rate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios