Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Real and Teton Westwood Balanced, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Teton Westwood. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood

-0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Teton is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Real and Teton Westwood Balanced in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Teton Westwood Balanced and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Real are associated (or correlated) with Teton Westwood. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Teton Westwood Balanced has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Real is expected to generate 1.84 times more return on investment than Teton Westwood. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.84 times more volatile than Teton Westwood Balanced. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Teton Westwood Balanced is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,152  in Goldman Sachs Real on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  171.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Real or generate 14.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Real  vs.  Teton Westwood Balanced

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Real has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Teton Westwood Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Teton Westwood Balanced has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Teton Westwood is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Teton Westwood positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Teton Westwood can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Teton Westwood will offset losses from the drop in Teton Westwood's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Real and Teton Westwood Balanced pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios