Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Large and Legg Mason Bw, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Legg Mason. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Legg is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Large and Legg Mason Bw in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Legg Mason Bw and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Large are associated (or correlated) with Legg Mason. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Legg Mason Bw has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 1.12 times less return on investment than Legg Mason. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Large is 1.16 times less risky than Legg Mason. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Legg Mason Bw is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,067  in Legg Mason Bw on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  317.00  from holding Legg Mason Bw or generate 15.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Large  vs.  Legg Mason Bw

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Large 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Large are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Legg Mason Bw 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Legg Mason Bw are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Legg Mason may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Legg Mason positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Legg Mason can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Legg Mason will offset losses from the drop in Legg Mason's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Large and Legg Mason Bw pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency