Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Large and Baillie Gifford China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Baillie Gifford. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Baillie is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Large and Baillie Gifford China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Baillie Gifford China and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Large are associated (or correlated) with Baillie Gifford. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Baillie Gifford China has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Large is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than Baillie Gifford. However, Goldman Sachs Large is 1.53 times less risky than Baillie Gifford. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Baillie Gifford China is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,773  in Goldman Sachs Large on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,103  from holding Goldman Sachs Large or generate 39.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Large  vs.  Baillie Gifford China

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Large 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Large are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Baillie Gifford China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Baillie Gifford China are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Baillie Gifford showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Baillie Gifford positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Baillie Gifford can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Baillie Gifford will offset losses from the drop in Baillie Gifford's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Large and Baillie Gifford China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets