Correlation Between Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guidepath Managed Futures and Oppenheimer Strategic Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guidepath Managed with a short position of Oppenheimer Strategic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic.
Diversification Opportunities for Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic
0.82 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Guidepath and Oppenheimer is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guidepath Managed Futures and Oppenheimer Strategic Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oppenheimer Strategic and Guidepath Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guidepath Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Oppenheimer Strategic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oppenheimer Strategic has no effect on the direction of Guidepath Managed i.e., Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic
Assuming the 90 days horizon Guidepath Managed Futures is expected to under-perform the Oppenheimer Strategic. In addition to that, Guidepath Managed is 2.24 times more volatile than Oppenheimer Strategic Income. It trades about -0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Oppenheimer Strategic Income is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 298.00 in Oppenheimer Strategic Income on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 12.00 from holding Oppenheimer Strategic Income or generate 4.03% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Guidepath Managed Futures vs. Oppenheimer Strategic Income
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Guidepath Managed Futures |
| Oppenheimer Strategic |
Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic
The main advantage of trading using opposite Guidepath Managed and Oppenheimer Strategic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guidepath Managed position performs unexpectedly, Oppenheimer Strategic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oppenheimer Strategic will offset losses from the drop in Oppenheimer Strategic's long position.The idea behind Guidepath Managed Futures and Oppenheimer Strategic Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Oppenheimer Strategic vs. Gamco Natural Resources | Oppenheimer Strategic vs. Jennison Natural Resources | Oppenheimer Strategic vs. Franklin Natural Resources | Oppenheimer Strategic vs. World Energy Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
| Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |