Correlation Between GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Ibase Gaming, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GlaxoSmithKline PLC with a short position of Ibase Gaming. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming.

Diversification Opportunities for GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GlaxoSmithKline and Ibase is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Ibase Gaming in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ibase Gaming and GlaxoSmithKline PLC is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR are associated (or correlated) with Ibase Gaming. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ibase Gaming has no effect on the direction of GlaxoSmithKline PLC i.e., GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming

Considering the 90-day investment horizon GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Ibase Gaming. However, GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR is 1.9 times less risky than Ibase Gaming. It trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ibase Gaming is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,659  in GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (226.00) from holding GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR or give up 6.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR  vs.  Ibase Gaming

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.
Ibase Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ibase Gaming has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.

GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming

The main advantage of trading using opposite GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Ibase Gaming positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GlaxoSmithKline PLC position performs unexpectedly, Ibase Gaming can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ibase Gaming will offset losses from the drop in Ibase Gaming's long position.
The idea behind GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Ibase Gaming pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements