Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Equity and Steward Ered Call, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Steward Covered. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Steward is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Equity and Steward Ered Call in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Steward Ered Call and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Equity are associated (or correlated) with Steward Covered. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Steward Ered Call has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Equity is expected to generate 1.16 times more return on investment than Steward Covered. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.16 times more volatile than Steward Ered Call. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Steward Ered Call is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,732  in Goldman Sachs Equity on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Equity or give up 0.23% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Equity  vs.  Steward Ered Call

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Equity has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking signals, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Steward Ered Call 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Steward Ered Call has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Steward Covered is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Steward Covered positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Steward Covered can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Steward Covered will offset losses from the drop in Steward Covered's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Equity and Steward Ered Call pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data