Correlation Between Home Depot and LogicMark
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Home Depot and LogicMark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Home Depot and LogicMark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Home Depot and LogicMark, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Home Depot and LogicMark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Home Depot with a short position of LogicMark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Home Depot and LogicMark.
Diversification Opportunities for Home Depot and LogicMark
-0.78 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Home and LogicMark is -0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Home Depot and LogicMark in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LogicMark and Home Depot is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Home Depot are associated (or correlated) with LogicMark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LogicMark has no effect on the direction of Home Depot i.e., Home Depot and LogicMark go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Home Depot and LogicMark
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Home Depot is expected to generate 0.09 times more return on investment than LogicMark. However, Home Depot is 10.77 times less risky than LogicMark. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. LogicMark is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest 39,046 in Home Depot on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 3,673 from holding Home Depot or generate 9.41% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Home Depot vs. LogicMark
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Home Depot |
| LogicMark |
Home Depot and LogicMark Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Home Depot and LogicMark
The main advantage of trading using opposite Home Depot and LogicMark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Home Depot position performs unexpectedly, LogicMark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LogicMark will offset losses from the drop in LogicMark's long position.| Home Depot vs. RLJ Lodging Trust | Home Depot vs. Aquagold International | Home Depot vs. Stepstone Group | Home Depot vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation |
| LogicMark vs. Guardforce AI Co | LogicMark vs. Knightscope | LogicMark vs. Bridger Aerospace Group | LogicMark vs. Iveda Solutions |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.
Other Complementary Tools
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance |