Correlation Between Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Alphacentric Hedged Market and Franklin Emerging Market, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Alphacentric Hedged with a short position of Franklin Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Alphacentric and FRANKLIN is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Alphacentric Hedged Market and Franklin Emerging Market in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Emerging Market and Alphacentric Hedged is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Alphacentric Hedged Market are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Emerging Market has no effect on the direction of Alphacentric Hedged i.e., Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Alphacentric Hedged Market is expected to generate 2.97 times more return on investment than Franklin Emerging. However, Alphacentric Hedged is 2.97 times more volatile than Franklin Emerging Market. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Emerging Market is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,734  in Alphacentric Hedged Market on October 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  115.00  from holding Alphacentric Hedged Market or generate 4.21% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Alphacentric Hedged Market  vs.  Franklin Emerging Market

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Alphacentric Hedged 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Alphacentric Hedged Market are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Alphacentric Hedged is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Franklin Emerging Market 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Emerging Market are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Franklin Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Alphacentric Hedged and Franklin Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Alphacentric Hedged position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Alphacentric Hedged Market and Franklin Emerging Market pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets