Correlation Between Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hennessy Technology Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hennessy Technology with a short position of Great-west Loomis. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis.

Diversification Opportunities for Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hennessy and Great-west is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hennessy Technology Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great West Loomis and Hennessy Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hennessy Technology Fund are associated (or correlated) with Great-west Loomis. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great West Loomis has no effect on the direction of Hennessy Technology i.e., Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis

Assuming the 90 days horizon Hennessy Technology is expected to generate 1.93 times less return on investment than Great-west Loomis. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Hennessy Technology Fund is 1.24 times less risky than Great-west Loomis. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great West Loomis Sayles is currently generating about 0.25 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,824  in Great West Loomis Sayles on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  354.00  from holding Great West Loomis Sayles or generate 9.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hennessy Technology Fund  vs.  Great West Loomis Sayles

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hennessy Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hennessy Technology Fund are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Hennessy Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Great West Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great West Loomis Sayles are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Great-west Loomis may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hennessy Technology and Great-west Loomis positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hennessy Technology position performs unexpectedly, Great-west Loomis can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great-west Loomis will offset losses from the drop in Great-west Loomis' long position.
The idea behind Hennessy Technology Fund and Great West Loomis Sayles pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets