Correlation Between Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Iron Mountain Incorporated and The Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Iron Mountain with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble.
Diversification Opportunities for Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble
0.44 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Iron and Procter is 0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Iron Mountain Incorporated and The Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Iron Mountain is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Iron Mountain Incorporated are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Iron Mountain i.e., Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Iron Mountain Incorporated is expected to generate 1.68 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Iron Mountain is 1.68 times more volatile than The Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest 26,557 in Iron Mountain Incorporated on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 47,918 from holding Iron Mountain Incorporated or generate 180.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 56.38% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Iron Mountain Incorporated vs. The Procter Gamble
Performance |
Timeline |
Iron Mountain |
Procter Gamble |
Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble
The main advantage of trading using opposite Iron Mountain and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Iron Mountain position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.Iron Mountain vs. Fras le SA | Iron Mountain vs. Western Digital | Iron Mountain vs. Energisa SA | Iron Mountain vs. Clave Indices De |
Procter Gamble vs. United Rentals | Procter Gamble vs. Tyson Foods | Procter Gamble vs. salesforce inc | Procter Gamble vs. Beyond Meat |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |