Correlation Between InterContinental and Iron Mountain

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both InterContinental and Iron Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining InterContinental and Iron Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between InterContinental Hotels Group and Iron Mountain, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on InterContinental and Iron Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in InterContinental with a short position of Iron Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of InterContinental and Iron Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for InterContinental and Iron Mountain

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between InterContinental and Iron is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding InterContinental Hotels Group and Iron Mountain in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron Mountain and InterContinental is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on InterContinental Hotels Group are associated (or correlated) with Iron Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron Mountain has no effect on the direction of InterContinental i.e., InterContinental and Iron Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between InterContinental and Iron Mountain

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon InterContinental Hotels Group is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Iron Mountain. However, InterContinental Hotels Group is 1.9 times less risky than Iron Mountain. It trades about 0.47 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Iron Mountain is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  856,200  in InterContinental Hotels Group on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  123,800  from holding InterContinental Hotels Group or generate 14.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

InterContinental Hotels Group  vs.  Iron Mountain

 Performance 
       Timeline  
InterContinental Hotels 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

27 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in InterContinental Hotels Group are ranked lower than 27 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, InterContinental exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Iron Mountain 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Iron Mountain are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Iron Mountain may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

InterContinental and Iron Mountain Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with InterContinental and Iron Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite InterContinental and Iron Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if InterContinental position performs unexpectedly, Iron Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Iron Mountain's long position.
The idea behind InterContinental Hotels Group and Iron Mountain pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings