Correlation Between Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Federated Emerging Market and Balanced Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federated Emerging with a short position of Balanced Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy.
Diversification Opportunities for Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy
0.49 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Federated and Balanced is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Federated Emerging Market and Balanced Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Balanced Strategy and Federated Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Federated Emerging Market are associated (or correlated) with Balanced Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Balanced Strategy has no effect on the direction of Federated Emerging i.e., Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy
Assuming the 90 days horizon Federated Emerging is expected to generate 1.5 times less return on investment than Balanced Strategy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Federated Emerging Market is 1.51 times less risky than Balanced Strategy. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Balanced Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 919.00 in Balanced Strategy Fund on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 210.00 from holding Balanced Strategy Fund or generate 22.85% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Federated Emerging Market vs. Balanced Strategy Fund
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Federated Emerging Market |
| Balanced Strategy |
Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Federated Emerging and Balanced Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federated Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Balanced Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Balanced Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Balanced Strategy's long position.| Federated Emerging vs. Fidelity Advisor Financial | Federated Emerging vs. 1919 Financial Services | Federated Emerging vs. Mesirow Financial Small | Federated Emerging vs. John Hancock Financial |
| Balanced Strategy vs. Janus Global Technology | Balanced Strategy vs. Allianzgi Technology Fund | Balanced Strategy vs. Technology Ultrasector Profund | Balanced Strategy vs. Science Technology Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
| FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities |