Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Intl and Goldman Sachs Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

-0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Goldman is -0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Intl and Goldman Sachs Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Technology and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Intl are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Technology has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers Intl is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Cohen Steers Intl is 1.26 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs Technology is currently generating about 0.3 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,328  in Goldman Sachs Technology on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  223.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or generate 6.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Intl  vs.  Goldman Sachs Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Intl 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Intl has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Intl and Goldman Sachs Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance