Correlation Between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Legg Mason Bw and Goldman Sachs Large, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Legg Mason with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Legg and GOLDMAN is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Legg Mason Bw and Goldman Sachs Large in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Large and Legg Mason is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Legg Mason Bw are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Large has no effect on the direction of Legg Mason i.e., Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Legg Mason is expected to generate 1.14 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Legg Mason is 1.39 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Large. It trades about 0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Large is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,895  in Goldman Sachs Large on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  48.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Large or generate 2.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Legg Mason Bw  vs.  Goldman Sachs Large

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Legg Mason Bw 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Legg Mason Bw are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Legg Mason is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Large 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Large are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Legg Mason position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Legg Mason Bw and Goldman Sachs Large pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope