Correlation Between Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Lifetime 2065 and Hennessy Nerstone Mid, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Lifetime with a short position of Hennessy Cornerstone. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Hennessy is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Lifetime 2065 and Hennessy Nerstone Mid in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hennessy Nerstone Mid and Mfs Lifetime is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Lifetime 2065 are associated (or correlated) with Hennessy Cornerstone. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hennessy Nerstone Mid has no effect on the direction of Mfs Lifetime i.e., Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Lifetime is expected to generate 2.33 times less return on investment than Hennessy Cornerstone. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Mfs Lifetime 2065 is 1.98 times less risky than Hennessy Cornerstone. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hennessy Nerstone Mid is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,206  in Hennessy Nerstone Mid on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  693.00  from holding Hennessy Nerstone Mid or generate 31.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy99.47%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Lifetime 2065  vs.  Hennessy Nerstone Mid

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Lifetime 2065 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Lifetime 2065 are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Mfs Lifetime is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Hennessy Nerstone Mid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hennessy Nerstone Mid are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Hennessy Cornerstone showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Lifetime and Hennessy Cornerstone positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Lifetime position performs unexpectedly, Hennessy Cornerstone can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hennessy Cornerstone will offset losses from the drop in Hennessy Cornerstone's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Lifetime 2065 and Hennessy Nerstone Mid pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets