Correlation Between Litigation Capital and AJ Bell

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and AJ Bell at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and AJ Bell into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and AJ Bell plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and AJ Bell and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of AJ Bell. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and AJ Bell.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and AJ Bell

0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and AJB is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and AJ Bell plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AJ Bell plc and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with AJ Bell. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AJ Bell plc has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and AJ Bell go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and AJ Bell

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to under-perform the AJ Bell. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Litigation Capital Management is 1.05 times less risky than AJ Bell. The stock trades about -0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The AJ Bell plc is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  46,350  in AJ Bell plc on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,300  from holding AJ Bell plc or generate 2.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  AJ Bell plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
AJ Bell plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in AJ Bell plc are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather conflicting technical and fundamental indicators, AJ Bell may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Litigation Capital and AJ Bell Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and AJ Bell

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and AJ Bell positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, AJ Bell can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AJ Bell will offset losses from the drop in AJ Bell's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and AJ Bell plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume