Correlation Between Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scharf Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs Absolute, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scharf Fund with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scharf and Goldman is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scharf Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs Absolute in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Absolute and Scharf Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scharf Fund Retail are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Absolute has no effect on the direction of Scharf Fund i.e., Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scharf Fund Retail is expected to generate 1.88 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Scharf Fund is 1.88 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Absolute. It trades about 0.44 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Absolute is currently generating about 0.28 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,428  in Scharf Fund Retail on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  329.00  from holding Scharf Fund Retail or generate 6.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scharf Fund Retail  vs.  Goldman Sachs Absolute

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scharf Fund Retail 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scharf Fund Retail are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Scharf Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Absolute 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Absolute are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scharf Fund and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scharf Fund position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Scharf Fund Retail and Goldman Sachs Absolute pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes