Correlation Between Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lululemon Athletica with a short position of Nutrition Management. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management.

Diversification Opportunities for Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Lululemon and Nutrition is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nutrition Management and Lululemon Athletica is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lululemon Athletica are associated (or correlated) with Nutrition Management. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nutrition Management has no effect on the direction of Lululemon Athletica i.e., Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Lululemon Athletica is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than Nutrition Management. However, Lululemon Athletica is 2.33 times less risky than Nutrition Management. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nutrition Management Services is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  50,163  in Lululemon Athletica on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10,453) from holding Lululemon Athletica or give up 20.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lululemon Athletica  vs.  Nutrition Management Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lululemon Athletica 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lululemon Athletica are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating essential indicators, Lululemon Athletica unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Nutrition Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Nutrition Management Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Nutrition Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lululemon Athletica position performs unexpectedly, Nutrition Management can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nutrition Management will offset losses from the drop in Nutrition Management's long position.
The idea behind Lululemon Athletica and Nutrition Management Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated