Correlation Between McDonalds and WELLS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both McDonalds and WELLS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining McDonalds and WELLS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McDonalds and WELLS FARGO NEW, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McDonalds and WELLS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McDonalds with a short position of WELLS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McDonalds and WELLS.

Diversification Opportunities for McDonalds and WELLS

-0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between McDonalds and WELLS is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McDonalds and WELLS FARGO NEW in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on WELLS FARGO NEW and McDonalds is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McDonalds are associated (or correlated) with WELLS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of WELLS FARGO NEW has no effect on the direction of McDonalds i.e., McDonalds and WELLS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between McDonalds and WELLS

Considering the 90-day investment horizon McDonalds is expected to generate 2.92 times less return on investment than WELLS. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, McDonalds is 1.42 times less risky than WELLS. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. WELLS FARGO NEW is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,627  in WELLS FARGO NEW on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  389.00  from holding WELLS FARGO NEW or generate 4.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

McDonalds  vs.  WELLS FARGO NEW

 Performance 
       Timeline  
McDonalds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in McDonalds are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, McDonalds is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
WELLS FARGO NEW 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days WELLS FARGO NEW has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, WELLS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

McDonalds and WELLS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with McDonalds and WELLS

The main advantage of trading using opposite McDonalds and WELLS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McDonalds position performs unexpectedly, WELLS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in WELLS will offset losses from the drop in WELLS's long position.
The idea behind McDonalds and WELLS FARGO NEW pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets