Correlation Between Matthews China and Eaton Vance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Matthews China and Eaton Vance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Matthews China and Eaton Vance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Matthews China Fund and Eaton Vance Greater, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Matthews China and Eaton Vance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Matthews China with a short position of Eaton Vance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Matthews China and Eaton Vance.

Diversification Opportunities for Matthews China and Eaton Vance

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Matthews and Eaton is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Matthews China Fund and Eaton Vance Greater in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eaton Vance Greater and Matthews China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Matthews China Fund are associated (or correlated) with Eaton Vance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eaton Vance Greater has no effect on the direction of Matthews China i.e., Matthews China and Eaton Vance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Matthews China and Eaton Vance

Assuming the 90 days horizon Matthews China Fund is expected to under-perform the Eaton Vance. In addition to that, Matthews China is 1.28 times more volatile than Eaton Vance Greater. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Eaton Vance Greater is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,459  in Eaton Vance Greater on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (54.00) from holding Eaton Vance Greater or give up 3.7% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Matthews China Fund  vs.  Eaton Vance Greater

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Matthews China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Matthews China Fund are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Matthews China showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Eaton Vance Greater 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Eaton Vance Greater are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Eaton Vance showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Matthews China and Eaton Vance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Matthews China and Eaton Vance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Matthews China and Eaton Vance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Matthews China position performs unexpectedly, Eaton Vance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eaton Vance will offset losses from the drop in Eaton Vance's long position.
The idea behind Matthews China Fund and Eaton Vance Greater pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities