Correlation Between Major Drilling and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Major Drilling and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Major Drilling and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Major Drilling Group and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Major Drilling and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Major Drilling with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Major Drilling and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Major Drilling and Maple Leaf

0.46
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Major and Maple is 0.46. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Major Drilling Group and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Major Drilling is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Major Drilling Group are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Major Drilling i.e., Major Drilling and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Major Drilling and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Major Drilling Group is expected to generate 1.1 times more return on investment than Maple Leaf. However, Major Drilling is 1.1 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  840.00  in Major Drilling Group on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  24.00  from holding Major Drilling Group or generate 2.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Major Drilling Group  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Major Drilling Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Major Drilling Group are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Major Drilling may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Major Drilling and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Major Drilling and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Major Drilling and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Major Drilling position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Major Drilling Group and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies