Correlation Between Global Health and Infomedia Press

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Global Health and Infomedia Press at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Global Health and Infomedia Press into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Global Health Limited and Infomedia Press Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Global Health and Infomedia Press and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Global Health with a short position of Infomedia Press. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Global Health and Infomedia Press.

Diversification Opportunities for Global Health and Infomedia Press

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Global and Infomedia is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Global Health Limited and Infomedia Press Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Infomedia Press and Global Health is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Global Health Limited are associated (or correlated) with Infomedia Press. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Infomedia Press has no effect on the direction of Global Health i.e., Global Health and Infomedia Press go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Global Health and Infomedia Press

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Global Health Limited is expected to generate 0.69 times more return on investment than Infomedia Press. However, Global Health Limited is 1.46 times less risky than Infomedia Press. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Infomedia Press Limited is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  74,725  in Global Health Limited on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  36,640  from holding Global Health Limited or generate 49.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Global Health Limited  vs.  Infomedia Press Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Global Health Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Health Limited are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Global Health is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Infomedia Press 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Infomedia Press Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Infomedia Press is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Global Health and Infomedia Press Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Global Health and Infomedia Press

The main advantage of trading using opposite Global Health and Infomedia Press positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Global Health position performs unexpectedly, Infomedia Press can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Infomedia Press will offset losses from the drop in Infomedia Press' long position.
The idea behind Global Health Limited and Infomedia Press Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like