Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Ceres Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Ceres Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Ceres Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Ceres Global Ag, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Ceres Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Ceres Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Ceres Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Ceres Global

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Ceres is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Ceres Global Ag in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ceres Global Ag and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Ceres Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ceres Global Ag has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Ceres Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Ceres Global

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf is expected to generate 3.32 times less return on investment than Ceres Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Maple Leaf Foods is 1.35 times less risky than Ceres Global. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ceres Global Ag is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  279.00  in Ceres Global Ag on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  41.00  from holding Ceres Global Ag or generate 14.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Ceres Global Ag

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Ceres Global Ag 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ceres Global Ag are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Ceres Global displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Maple Leaf and Ceres Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Ceres Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Ceres Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Ceres Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ceres Global will offset losses from the drop in Ceres Global's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Ceres Global Ag pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data