Correlation Between MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MIC Electronics Limited and Jubilant Foodworks Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MIC Electronics with a short position of Jubilant Foodworks. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks.

Diversification Opportunities for MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between MIC and Jubilant is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MIC Electronics Limited and Jubilant Foodworks Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jubilant Foodworks and MIC Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MIC Electronics Limited are associated (or correlated) with Jubilant Foodworks. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jubilant Foodworks has no effect on the direction of MIC Electronics i.e., MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MIC Electronics Limited is expected to under-perform the Jubilant Foodworks. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, MIC Electronics Limited is 1.08 times less risky than Jubilant Foodworks. The stock trades about -0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Jubilant Foodworks Limited is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  57,600  in Jubilant Foodworks Limited on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  6,855  from holding Jubilant Foodworks Limited or generate 11.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

MIC Electronics Limited  vs.  Jubilant Foodworks Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MIC Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MIC Electronics Limited are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very inconsistent fundamental indicators, MIC Electronics may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Jubilant Foodworks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Jubilant Foodworks Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Jubilant Foodworks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks

The main advantage of trading using opposite MIC Electronics and Jubilant Foodworks positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MIC Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Jubilant Foodworks can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jubilant Foodworks will offset losses from the drop in Jubilant Foodworks' long position.
The idea behind MIC Electronics Limited and Jubilant Foodworks Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences