Correlation Between Microsoft and Universal Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Universal Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Universal Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Universal Health Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Universal Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Universal Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Universal Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Universal Health

-0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Universal is -0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Universal Health Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Health Services and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Universal Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Health Services has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Universal Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Universal Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Microsoft is expected to generate 2.53 times less return on investment than Universal Health. In addition to that, Microsoft is 1.07 times more volatile than Universal Health Services. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Health Services is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  19,000  in Universal Health Services on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  300.00  from holding Universal Health Services or generate 1.58% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Universal Health Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Universal Health Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Universal Health Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Microsoft and Universal Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Universal Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Universal Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Universal Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Health will offset losses from the drop in Universal Health's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Universal Health Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators