Correlation Between Microsoft and Credit Suisse
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Credit Suisse at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Credit Suisse into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Credit Suisse, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Credit Suisse and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Credit Suisse. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Credit Suisse.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Credit Suisse
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Credit is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Credit Suisse in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Credit Suisse and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Credit Suisse. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Credit Suisse has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Credit Suisse go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Credit Suisse
If you would invest 31,884 in Microsoft on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 12,992 from holding Microsoft or generate 40.75% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Flat |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 0.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. Credit Suisse
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Microsoft |
| Credit Suisse |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Microsoft and Credit Suisse Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and Credit Suisse
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Credit Suisse positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Credit Suisse can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Credit Suisse will offset losses from the drop in Credit Suisse's long position.| Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |