Correlation Between Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of SpringBig Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings

-0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and SpringBig is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SpringBig Holdings and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with SpringBig Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SpringBig Holdings has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.14 times more return on investment than SpringBig Holdings. However, Microsoft is 6.94 times less risky than SpringBig Holdings. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SpringBig Holdings is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  24,616  in Microsoft on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17,084  from holding Microsoft or generate 69.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy32.06%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  SpringBig Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
SpringBig Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days SpringBig Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable forward indicators, SpringBig Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, SpringBig Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SpringBig Holdings will offset losses from the drop in SpringBig Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and SpringBig Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio